Magnetization Curve of CT - Electrical Volt

Magnetization Curve of CT

The magnetization curve of the current transformer shows the relationship between the secondary excitation current and secondary excitation voltage. The equivalent circuit diagram of the current transformer is as given below.

Schematic diagram of CT

I1: primary current.
I2 = Kn I1: secondary current for a perfect CT.
Is: secondary current actually flowing through the circuit. Im: magnetizing current. E: induced electromotive force.
Vs: output voltage.
Lm: magnetization inductance (saturable) equivalent to the CT.
Rct: resistance at the CT secondary

How CT Works?

The current transformer has two sets of winding around the magnetic core. when alternating current(Ip) flows in the primary, the alternating field( H=Np*Ip) is generated and the magnetic flux flows in the core. The magnetic flux gets linked to the secondary of the CT and produces a voltage (Vs) in the secondary.

If the secondary of the current transformer is not connected to a burden, the secondary current will be zero. In the absence of the secondary current(Is), the net magnetic flux in the core will be equal to the flux created by the primary current. The higher flux density in the core will saturate the core and the dangerously high voltage is produced across the secondary under this condition, That is why the secondary of the current transformer must not be kept open circuited.

If the secondary of the current transformer is connected to a burden, the secondary current will set up its own magnetic flux in the core, and the flux generated due to secondary current opposes the flux generated by the primary. Thus the net flux density in the core is below the rated flux density of the core and the secondary voltage is in order of the few volts.

The current transformer when connected to burdens like protection relay, energy meter or ampere meter, the total current that pass through the CT is magnetizing current (Im) & secondary current (Is).

Thus, the total secondary current Is is the vector sum of magnetizing current (Im) and secondary load current (IL) flowing through the protection relay. During fault condition magnetizing current can go above its knee point voltage and CT gets saturated.

Just below the knee point voltage, all the magnets are aligned in the same direction as the magnetic field and the maximum rated flux density of the core has reached. If the primary current is further increased after attaining the maximum flux density in the core, the core can’t handle this increased magnetic field and CT is said to be saturated.

Magnetization Curve of CT

The magnetization curve of CT can be divided into three zones.

1. Non-saturated Zone

In the non-saturated zone of the magnetizing curve, the CT consumes a very low magnetizing current and the secondary current is almost linear to the primary current. The ratio error is minimum in this zone and the current transformer used for measuring the electrical parameters like ampere, power, energy must be operated in this zone. The metering class CT operates in this region. The class of the current transformer for the metering class is 0.1s,0.2s,0.5s & 1.0s.

2. Intermediate Zone

In the intermediate Zone magnetizing current increases with an increase in primary current, and the secondary current is not proportional to the primary current; Non-linearity increases as the primary current is increased.

The protection class current transformer is operated in this zone. During a fault, the magnitude of the primary current is in the order of kilo-amperes and it is expected that CT must not get saturated at the time of sensing the fault current else the protection system would not work.

3. Saturated Zone

The curve becomes virtually horizontal because of the increase of magnetizing current drastically, and the error in transformation ratio is high, the secondary current is distorted by saturation. If the current transformer operates in this zone; no protection of the electrical network can be ensured.

Related Posts on Current Transformer

2 thoughts on “Magnetization Curve of CT”

1. Nice article